The defense and the prosecution have rested and the jury is filing into the jury room to decide if a young Spanish-American is guilty or innocent of murdering his father. What begins as an open and shut case soon becomes a mini-drama of each of the jurors' prejudices and preconceptions about the trial, the accused, and each other.
安迪是費城一家大律師事務所的律師，由於他工作出色受到了老闆的提拔，但老闆知道他是一個同性戀並患了愛滋病後，解僱了他，安迪為了個人的尊嚴和權利，請他一次工作中偶然認識的祖做律師，控告老闆和事務所，面對着這場關於人權、傳統道德、社會觀念、尊嚴的鬥爭，安迪克服了自身健康的急劇惡化，在祖的幫助下，憑着堅強的毅力，在臨死之前，終於打贏了這場官司。
一個講述南部社會的懷疑與偏見的故事，年輕律師為一名黑人工廠工人辯護，他被控謀殺強姦他十歲女兒的兩名白人男人。案件重點在於公民權利，雙方都引起更多暴力行為，在陪審團作出裁決之前要召來國民警衛隊。
With his gangster boss on trial for murder, a mob thug known as "the Teacher" tells Annie Laird she must talk her fellow jurors into a not-guilty verdict, implying that he'll kill her son Oliver if she fails. She manages to do this, but, when it becomes clear that the mobsters might want to silence her for good, she sends Oliver abroad and tries to gather evidence of the plot against her, setting up a final showdown.
When Rudy Baylor, a young attorney with no clients, goes to work for a seedy ambulance chaser, he wants to help the parents of a terminally ill boy in their suit against an insurance company. But to take on corporate America, Rudy and a scrappy paralegal must open their own law firm.
During the trial of a man accused of his father's murder, a lone juror takes a stand against the guilty verdict handed down by the others as a result of their preconceptions and prejudices.
Semi-retired Michigan lawyer Paul Biegler takes the case of Army Lt. Manion, who murdered a local innkeeper after his wife claimed that he raped her. Over the course of an extensive trial, Biegler parries with District Attorney Lodwick and out-of-town prosecutor Claude Dancer to set his client free, but his case rests on the victim's mysterious business partner, who's hiding a dark secret.
俄羅斯發生了一起離奇謀殺案，一名來自車臣、剛滿18歲的的少年，因為涉嫌殺害他的繼父，而被判處了「一級謀殺」的重罪。由於被害者是一名前蘇聯軍官，他過去曾參與對車臣的鎮壓；加上案發當晚，沒有任何人親眼目睹行兇過程，使這起謀殺案仍存有許多的疑點…。對於12名來自不同行業、不同地位的陪審團員而言，男孩殺人「有罪」的結論是不言而喻，但其中1位團員卻力排眾議，要求大家重新再討論，給這名少年最後一個機會…。不料，這項要求卻激怒了其他11名陪審團員，因為大家都一致認為：沒必要浪費時間去為一個已經〝蓋棺論定〞的案子翻案。然而這名陪審團員卻不願放棄，他不但重新提出對少年有利的說法，並設法個別突破這11名陪審團員的心防，企圖說服他們以扭轉原審判的結果！車臣少年究竟有沒有殺人？這名陪審團員又為何堅決認定他是無罪的呢？當他對其他陪審團員一一展開反駁時，他能成功說服他們？還是會更激怒他們？！一場震撼人心的世紀審判，自此登場…。
When a Supreme Court judge commits suicide and his secretary is found murdered, all fingers point to Carl Anderson, a homeless veteran who's deaf and mute. But when public defender Kathleen Riley is assigned to his case, she begins to believe that Anderson may actually be innocent. Juror Eddie Sanger, a Washington lobbyist, agrees, and together the pair begins their own investigation of events.
A lawyer defends her father accused of war crimes, but there is more to the case than she suspects.
A murderer is brought to court and only Miss Marple is unconvinced of his innocence. Once again she begins her own investigation.
Seoul, South Korea, September 21st, 2008. Eight citizens, the first to intervene as jurors in the country's legal history, are randomly selected to examine a matricide case that appears to have been resolved due to the existence of apparently conclusive evidence.
Romance at a murder trial with a pair of sequestered jurors who are the only ones who think that the woman in the dock is innocent. Separated from their normal lives, jurors Terry Scott and David Campbell start to fall in love.
A divorce lawyer prospers as a gambling tycoon.
A juror on a murder trial begins to believe that the man charged with the crime is innocent — and that the real killer is her own husband.
The defense and the prosecution have rested and the jury is filing into the jury room to decide if a young man is guilty or innocent of murdering his father.
All 12 jury members who sent an innocent man to the gallows are gathered together for a demonstration of how convictions can be made on circumstantial evidence. During the proceedings, a phony murder is quickly revealed as the real thing.
Documentary about the jurors in a murder trial who handed out the death sentence to the defendant, and how their attitudes have changed 20+ years later.