讨论 Fright Night

If the rule to save Amy was to kill Dandridge by midnight then why was Evil Ed still a vampire at the end?

3 回复(第 1 页,共 1 页)

Jump to last post

I don't think that the vampire at the end was Evil Ed (even though they put in the voice-over teasing that it might), as in Fright Night 2, Charlie's psychiatrist specifically states that Evil Ed was killed by Peter Vincent.

Even with that, according to the rules the Dandridge had to be killed within 12 hours of his victim being turned in order to turn them back, and Evil Ed had been bitten long before Amy was.

@Innovator said:

I don't think that the vampire at the end was Evil Ed (even though they put in the voice-over teasing that it might), as in Fright Night 2, Charlie's psychiatrist specifically states that Evil Ed was killed by Peter Vincent.

Even with that, according to the rules the Dandridge had to be killed within 12 hours of his victim being turned in order to turn them back, and Evil Ed had been bitten long before Amy was.

I believe the rule stated was before dawn. Nothing about a specific amount of hours. Even if we assume the rule is 12 hours then Ed's turning would fit in that time frame as well since it was most likely past 7:00PM since they were to meet Vincent outside of Dandridge by 6PM and he was late. I speculate that Tom Holland, the original writer/director of the film did indeed mean that to be Ed at the end and just sloppily forgot about the rule he imposed. I guess it could be argued that since Ed wanted to be a vampire, he therefore remained one.

@mechajutaro said:

@movie_nazi said:

If the rule to save Amy was to kill Dandridge by midnight then why was Evil Ed still a vampire at the end?

My read on this situation: filmmakers are in the business of entertainment, not delivering everything with mathematical precision. They likely didn't notice the inconsistency that you've detected here, Naz, much in the same way that relatively few folk have ever recognized that James Bond isn't much of a spy or even an assassin, so much as he is an all purpose action man

Yes, especially in the 80s where as long as the action moved along you had a fine film. No time to think about incidentals like logic or following what was previously stated to be the rule. 😜

Still a fine film though. Has a really good score.

找不到电影或剧集?登录并创建它吧。

全站通用

s 聚焦到搜索栏
p 打开个人资料菜单
esc 关闭打开的窗口
? 打开键盘快捷键窗口

在媒体页面

b 返回(或返回上级)
e 进入编辑页面

在电视季页面

(右箭头)下一季
(左箭头)前一季

在电视集页面

(右箭头)下一集
(左箭头)前一集

在所有图像页面

a 打开添加图片窗口

在所有编辑页面

t 打开翻译选择器
ctrl+ s 提交

在讨论页面

n 创建新讨论
w 切换关注状态
p 设为公开 / 私密讨论
c 关闭 / 开放讨论
a 打开活动页
r 回复讨论
l 跳转至最新回复
ctrl+ enter 发送信息
(右箭头)下一页
(左箭头)前一页

设置

想给这个条目评分或将其添加到片单中?

登录

还不是会员?

注册加入社区