It's no secret that Hollywood can often be a wee bit doopid. But perhaps we as a moviegoing public aren't always as clever as we'd like to think we are either.
It is my aim to seek out the most moronic of well known movie complaints audiences collectively spat out and clarify exactly why they deserve a ticket to retardation station. First up: Signs.
Famous Complaint: If water is toxic to the aliens, why would they invade a planet that is 2 thirds water?
Why It Makes No Sense: This I never heard the end of since the second I emerged from the cinema. The aliens weren't looking for a holiday vacation where they could sit by the pool with a pina colada and the latest John Grisham. They needed something. Possibly us or other living beings to harvest, or maybe a planet with an atmosphere that supports life because their's is dying.
Now our naysayers in the audience for some reason seem to be under the impression that the aliens had a huge choice. That they perused a massive array of potential planets like a box of Thorntons and exclaimed "That one! The one covered in poison!"
Well I don't know what your knowledge of the universe is, so I hope I'm not trampling on anyone's dreams here, but most planets are barren with no means of supporting any kind of life. In fact, apart from us, the amount of known planets with life on them totals a number roughly between 1 and minus 1.
So this is a compliant based on an awful lot of assumption. It assumes we know the alien's situation, that they're not desperate in any way. It assumes there is a huge amount of planets for the aliens to choose from and it even assumes that they have the technological capabilities to reach those planets. Considering a lot of movie plot points are convoluted and full of holes, it's shocking how much suspension of disbelief this criticism requires.
Now if Shyamalan went into detail explaining the aliens situation to us this would destroy the feel of the film. It's a film aiming for mystery and tension, not a complex Star Trek like analysis of alien life. The fact we don't know the motivation of the aliens is what makes them scarier. I don't want to hear all that kind of exposition anyway, I can work it out myself. To spell it out would insult the audience's intelligence.
If you didn't enjoy Signs, that's fine. But you don't need to come up with a dopey reason to justify that dislike. You just didn't like it. Reeelax.
找不到电影或剧集?登录并创建它吧。
wonder2wonder 的回复
于 2017 年 03 月 07 日 2:09下午
Poisonous cannot be the reason for an intelligent species to avoid. In fact it would be a challenge to investigate, explore and use that poison. Humans would do anything to conquer a place two third uranium or petroleum.
JustinJackFlash 的回复
于 2017 年 03 月 07 日 2:35下午
Exactly. There are so many reasons why they might attack a dangerous planet. Greed being a big one.
warrior-poet 的回复
于 2020 年 09 月 23 日 1:20下午
Very well said! Below is a copy of one my own replies from years past, which I repeated in various versions many times over the years to shortsighted posts just like you address here.
JustinJackFlash 的回复
于 2020 年 09 月 24 日 6:34上午
Good stuff and well argued.
JustinJackFlash 的回复
于 2020 年 09 月 24 日 6:40上午
Not quite sure what you're saying here, D-race. And no, an office worker probably wouldn't expect too much of a risk from his workplace. But a fireman might expect the possibility of burning to death, a soldier might expect to get shot and an astronaut (which is essentially what the aliens are from their point of view) could expect any number of dark fates.
FrankSmith 的回复
于 2021 年 01 月 28 日 2:11下午
Lionel Pritchard and the Wolfington Brothers