Actually, Iron Man killed Thanos with one of Thanos' gloves; Tony just couldn't take the kickback or whatever from the damn glove and it killed him.
On a side note: I've been wondering, did Tony really need to die? Or was it nothing more than pragmatism on the part of Marvel
They've pretty much already established that normal people can't handle using the infinity stones individually, and powerful ones can barely handle all of them. Both Thanos and the Hulk were burned badly while doing/undoing the snap. There's was no way that Tony (a normal human) could have survived doing his own snap. Tony died because RDJs contract was up and his agent kept negotiating higher and higher paychecks for each subsequent film he did past it (reports say he was paid $75 million just for Endgame). Sooner or later that relationship had to end.
Actually, Iron Man killed Thanos with one of Thanos' gloves; Tony just couldn't take the kickback or whatever from the damn glove and it killed him.
On a side note: I've been wondering, did Tony really need to die? Or was it nothing more than pragmatism on the part of Marvel
They've pretty much already established that normal people can't handle using the infinity stones individually, and powerful ones can barely handle all of them. Both Thanos and the Hulk were burned badly while doing/undoing the snap. There's was no way that Tony (a normal human) could have survived doing his own snap.
Right... I think it was stated in the film that there was radiation involved with using the stones and that's what killed him. I knew all that, but thanks. Peter Quill is what? Half-human and half-titan, and that's what played a hand in his surviving holding one stone in Guardians.
Tony died because RDJs contract was up and his agent kept negotiating higher and higher paychecks for each subsequent film he did past it (reports say he was paid $75 million just for Endgame). Sooner or later that relationship had to end.
That's kind of what I was getting at, but also the narrative of the film seemed to set Stark up as this irredeemable guy. I mean, Iron Man had already stacked the cards against him as being narcissistic, a playboy, etc. But this film seems to do even more of that, IIRC.
... I mean, Iron Man had already stacked the cards against him as being narcissistic, a playboy, etc. But this film seems to do even more of that, IIRC.
I believe this film showed Tony cracking time travel, after he decided to put his mind to it...
... I mean, Iron Man had already stacked the cards against him as being narcissistic, a playboy, etc. But this film seems to do even more of that, IIRC.
I believe this film showed Tony cracking time travel, after he decided to put his mind to it...
It did. It did, even if the explanation for how he did it felt a bit unsatisfactory. The film even portrays him as a loving father... but I'm sticking to my guns... unfortunately, I don't have time right this moment to wrack my brain for examples of what I'm referring to... maybe later.
... I mean, Iron Man had already stacked the cards against him as being narcissistic, a playboy, etc. But this film seems to do even more of that, IIRC.
I believe this film showed Tony cracking time travel, after he decided to put his mind to it...
It did. It did, even if the explanation for how he did it felt a bit unsatisfactory. The film even portrays him as a loving father... but I'm sticking to my guns... unfortunately, I don't have time right this moment to wrack my brain for examples of what I'm referring to... maybe later.
I think what I meant earlier is that the franchise set Stark up as kind of a "bad boy," film after film & this one sort of pounded a final nail in the coffin. You know, take the scene where he drives up to Steve blasting the music in his car... it's like they're saying, "Tony won't change, he won't grow up like Banner obviously did." And so, he's got to go.
Contestado por questions and answers
el 26 de marzo de 2022 a las 13:41
answer - thanos kills iron man with his gloves
Contestado por tmdb53400018
el 27 de marzo de 2022 a las 11:24
Actually, Iron Man killed Thanos with one of Thanos' gloves; Tony just couldn't take the kickback or whatever from the damn glove and it killed him.
On a side note: I've been wondering, did Tony really need to die? Or was it nothing more than pragmatism on the part of Marvel
Contestado por Innovator
el 27 de marzo de 2022 a las 16:28
They've pretty much already established that normal people can't handle using the infinity stones individually, and powerful ones can barely handle all of them. Both Thanos and the Hulk were burned badly while doing/undoing the snap. There's was no way that Tony (a normal human) could have survived doing his own snap. Tony died because RDJs contract was up and his agent kept negotiating higher and higher paychecks for each subsequent film he did past it (reports say he was paid $75 million just for Endgame). Sooner or later that relationship had to end.
Contestado por tmdb53400018
el 27 de marzo de 2022 a las 17:50
Right... I think it was stated in the film that there was radiation involved with using the stones and that's what killed him. I knew all that, but thanks. Peter Quill is what? Half-human and half-titan, and that's what played a hand in his surviving holding one stone in Guardians.
That's kind of what I was getting at, but also the narrative of the film seemed to set Stark up as this irredeemable guy. I mean, Iron Man had already stacked the cards against him as being narcissistic, a playboy, etc. But this film seems to do even more of that, IIRC.
Contestado por Midi-chlorian_Count
el 27 de marzo de 2022 a las 19:11
I believe this film showed Tony cracking time travel, after he decided to put his mind to it...
Contestado por tmdb53400018
el 27 de marzo de 2022 a las 22:27
It did. It did, even if the explanation for how he did it felt a bit unsatisfactory. The film even portrays him as a loving father... but I'm sticking to my guns... unfortunately, I don't have time right this moment to wrack my brain for examples of what I'm referring to... maybe later.
Contestado por tmdb53400018
el 28 de marzo de 2022 a las 11:45
I think what I meant earlier is that the franchise set Stark up as kind of a "bad boy," film after film & this one sort of pounded a final nail in the coffin. You know, take the scene where he drives up to Steve blasting the music in his car... it's like they're saying, "Tony won't change, he won't grow up like Banner obviously did." And so, he's got to go.