But with $170 mill in the first weekend and another $88 this weekend, Disney found yet ANOTHER way to print its own paper! Expect Little Mermaid, Aladdin, Lion King and ALL other animated classics remade live action! I for one will not give them another dime! Oh wait, i didn't with this one either...I bought tickets for Kong and snuck into B&tB with my daughter...and thank GOD I did, that was a brutal sit through. Only redeeming actor was Kevin Kline! Luke Evans was OK, but he couldn't do much with the character...he HAS to be one dimensional.
فیلم و نمایش تلویزیونی را نمیتوانید پیدا کنید؟ به سیستم وارد شوید تا آن را ایجاد کنید.
آیا میخواهید به این مورد امتیاز دهید یا به فهرست اضافه کنید؟
عضو نیستید؟
پاسخ توسط HorrorMetal
در تاریخ مارس 28, 2017 ساعت 12:00 ق.ض
I didn't like it nearly as much as I hoped I would, and I agree that Kline was the best part.
پاسخ توسط QueenFanUS
در تاریخ مارس 30, 2017 ساعت 12:05 ق.ض
Nice...so you stole from all the people that put a couple of years of their lives to produce this film and gave it to people who didn't produce it. Nice example for your daughter.
پاسخ توسط jorgito2001
در تاریخ مارس 30, 2017 ساعت 10:59 ق.ض
Yes I did...so there!
I'm sure Disney didn't miss my measly $16 considering the box office numbers...I don't think anyone on the production is gonna starve to death anytime soon. lol
پاسخ توسط MysteryReader
در تاریخ مارس 30, 2017 ساعت 2:27 ب.ض
Disney sucks... but like all big studios, they're not willing to gamble on new ideas. They're running Star Wars into the ground too.
پاسخ توسط Data20112018
در تاریخ مارس 30, 2017 ساعت 3:46 ب.ض
I was hoping to watch this if it was good. But a lot of people seem to be sour about it... I remember loving the animated film from the 90s as a kid.
Might consider going to see Life instead. Not sure yet.
پاسخ توسط QueenFanUS
در تاریخ مارس 30, 2017 ساعت 8:19 ب.ض
It's still stealing.
پاسخ توسط QueenFanUS
در تاریخ مارس 30, 2017 ساعت 8:31 ب.ض
So...just to be clear...jorgito2001 thinks that going into a theatre to watch a film that has been produced by hundreds of people over years of their life is okay to give the money to people that din't work on it.
I'm sorry...Kong is produced by Warner Brothers. Is Warner Brothers a "charity case" or are they not part of a multi-billion dollar conglomerate as well?
پاسخ توسط CraigJamesReview
در تاریخ مارس 31, 2017 ساعت 11:57 ب.ض
I thought it was fine, but that's basically code for disappointment because when you're remaking a classic, you gotta make it great and some of the musical numbers and CGI just fell really flat.
I'm trying to go for an engaging, funny youtube channel so, if you have the time, take a look. Hope you enjoy what you see. Thanks in advance. https://youtu.be/AD4MjlFtI4k
پاسخ توسط CelluloidLover
در تاریخ آوریل 8, 2017 ساعت 9:47 ب.ض
I guess after The Jungle Book made hand over fist, Disney has found their meal ticket and since Beauty and the Beast is now the 12th all-time highest domestic grosser, they don't even have to try any more, which really sucks.
پاسخ توسط MDBAddict
در تاریخ آوریل 9, 2017 ساعت 7:08 ب.ض
You know what? This is a general comment to those who were disappointed that it didn't live up to their expectations. It stinks that you didn't like it. Everyone's entitled to their opinion. I liked it but if it didn't meet your expectations, meh too bad you wasted a few dollars and a few hours. But I see that some expressed a little strongly their dislike of this film because it didn't live up to the animated one and sometimes I think, "Hmm is it that serious?"
But then again if Disney screws up The Lion King I'll pretty much boycott all the things Disney. Lol, maybe.
پاسخ توسط jorgito2001
در تاریخ آوریل 11, 2017 ساعت 4:05 ب.ض
I just want more movies in the MONSTERVERSE..the next being Godzilla 2! I';d rather support that Universe then Disney's new cash cow...half assed Live Action movies of their animated classics.
پاسخ توسط skribb
در تاریخ مه 5, 2017 ساعت 8:08 ق.ض
You didn't name a single reason why BATB live action was horrible
پاسخ توسط bratface
در تاریخ مه 5, 2017 ساعت 6:07 ب.ض
No jorgito2001 this is the original:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beauty_and_the_Beast_(1946_film)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0038348/
http://rarefilm.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/La-belle-et-la-bete-AKA-Beauty-and-the-Beast-1946-3.jpg
http://www.scifimoviepage.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/beauty_art_side_by_side-600x300.jpg
پاسخ توسط AmBeck22
در تاریخ مه 18, 2017 ساعت 12:34 ب.ض
You're being incredibly obtuse. You know he/she meant the original Disney animated film.
پاسخ توسط skribb
در تاریخ مه 18, 2017 ساعت 2:13 ب.ض
On purpose I assume. Which is much better