I have the feeling that results are going to be the same. Me snoozing in my chair.
It's a good movie (the only part I didn't like were the scenes at the airport), watch it on BluRay though and don't ever watch it if it comes on a regular TV station (too many cuts/edits).
Take a moment to look away if you need to. This film is great but alas, the ending is unforgivable; in part that it sets the sombre and depressing tone for the dreadful films which followed. I'd like a fan-edit to somehow miraculously repair this, consigning the later films to the bin where they belong.
The sooner 007 is handed off to more capable hands and a less miserable soul the better - the wait continues.
@Sociolect Why not both of them? If for no reason, to admire the time (it took them 24 days to film the Poker scenes) and effort the producers put into making up IMHO, one of the best parts of the movie.
-------Fasten your seatbelts, it's going to be a bumpy night--------
@MongoLloyd I totally, totally agree with you. The poker scenes are one of the best parts of the movie (did you know that it took 24 days to shoot that entire sequence?)!
BTW: is that Christopher Walken in your ID circle?
-------Fasten your seatbelts, it's going to be a bumpy night--------
@Moviedibert345 After I answered your post, I forgot that while the Casino Royale Poker Game was a bit dull, I remembered that it was breaks that had more action. For instance, Bond killing those Ugandan Warlords, and when La Chefiffe (sorry for the spelling) poisons Bond's and Bond nearly dies.
----------Fasten your seatbels, it's going to be a bumpy night--------
@MongoLloyd I totally, totally agree with you. The poker scenes are one of the best parts of the movie (did you know that it took 24 days to shoot that entire sequence?)!
BTW: is that Christopher Walken in your ID circle?
-------Fasten your seatbelts, it's going to be a bumpy night--------
Just from a story perspective, it outshines all the other Craig Bond films, but yeah, the poker scene, the opening chase scene, the poisoning scene, actual characters with some depth, Eva Green...
@MongoLloyd That's cool about Christopher Walken in your circle. Tell me, what was your opinion of him as the villian in A View To A Kill?
Although you're right about Casino Royale, I am one of those people who really liked Quantum Of Solace. IMO, I think that it wasn't well received was because it was a first for the Bond movies (a direct sequel). As you know, usually at the end of a Bond movie, he goes off into the sunset with the female lead, and that's the last the last you ever see of her. Vesper was different to Bond. He was so in love with her that her death really affected him. And I thought it was interesting that the beginning of QOS starts takes place ten minutes after the end of Casino Royale.
We both could say a lot of other things about QOS, but I've always believed that the Bond franchise embraces all different sorts of people who liked (or not) the different Bonds, etc.
I guess I'm being a little sensitive lately because a week ago I posted in one of the Bond boards that I thought Spectre was okay but it seemed like "Daniel Craig's Greatest Bond Hits" and someone posted back that because I had the nerve to say that about Spectre, it proved that I hated ALL Bond movies (WTF? )
Anyway, I have go study for my college class so have a happy Fourth of July and take care.
I actually don't remember ever seeing AVTAK but I'm downloading it now :-)
I also really like Quantum, but I feel like CR is superior even without Olga, hehe.
What I love about the Craig Bond films is he's a bit of a rogue agent who runs off and does stuff he wants to do rather than only awaiting orders and acting on orders. In the end, he achieves the desired result, but he drives M nuts in the process.
I honestly don't remember much about Spectre at all, which means it wasn't memorable and more than likely a weak film. I vaguely remember Lea Seydoux fighting with another female character... and... Jeremy Renner?
Skyfall, I had big issues with, not the least of which was a villain capable of hacking satellites, computers, etc., who then shows up to the Skyfall estate with his henchmen to elicit an old school attack with guns. For a high tech guy with all his capabilities, you'd think he'd have waged a high tech attack. That was disappointing.
I actually don't remember ever seeing AVTAK but I'm downloading it now :-)
I also really like Quantum, but I feel like CR is superior even without Olga, hehe.
What I love about the Craig Bond films is he's a bit of a rogue agent who runs off and does stuff he wants to do rather than only awaiting orders and acting on orders. In the end, he achieves the desired result, but he drives M nuts in the process.
I honestly don't remember much about Spectre at all, which means it wasn't memorable and more than likely a weak film. I vaguely remember Lea Seydoux fighting with another female character... and... Jeremy Renner?
Lol
@MongoLloyd said:
Skyfall, I had big issues with, not the least of which was a villain capable of hacking satellites, computers, etc., who then shows up to the Skyfall estate with his henchmen to elicit an old school attack with guns. For a high tech guy with all his capabilities, you'd think he'd have waged a high tech attack. That was disappointing.
But he did wage a "high tech" attack at Skyfall manor. That was the whole point of the theme threaded in the film: old vs new. Silva used a helicopter armed with the lasted tech. His men carried modern rifles and had smoke grenades. That is a polar opposite to Bond's ancient house, his old shotguns, Kincade and M are tired but also "played out" and he uses his '64 Aston for crying out loud!! So it was an old school vs new school action scene.
His men carried modern rifles and had smoke grenades. That is a polar opposite to Bond's ancient house, his old shotguns, Kincade and M are tired but also "played out" and he uses his '64 Aston for crying out loud!! So it was an old school vs new school action scene.
"Sometimes the old ways are the best."
I think it's dumb, lazy, uncreative, and pandering to the John Wick loving crowd. The showdown in The Equalizer at The Home Depot store was more compelling than the end of Skyfall.
His men carried modern rifles and had smoke grenades. That is a polar opposite to Bond's ancient house, his old shotguns, Kincade and M are tired but also "played out" and he uses his '64 Aston for crying out loud!! So it was an old school vs new school action scene.
"Sometimes the old ways are the best."
I think it's dumb, lazy, uncreative, and pandering to the John Wick loving crowd. The showdown in The Equalizer at The Home Depot store was more compelling than the end of Skyfall.
Um, SF came out way before JW, so drop the "pandering" act. There aren't many connections to JW either. However, the stylized fist fights could be seen as a loose similarity, I presume.
Back to the themes:
SF wasn't only an action film. It was also - wait for it - an intellectual film. People who naturally detest SF obviously didn't take note of the deep embedded themes in the movie. These central themes are integral in understanding the motives for their actions. If you don't pick up on them, then it'll ruin the enjoyment of the film.
A well known example is why Silva would let himself get caught. Stupid, you say? Not exactly. It's about betrayal and justice. Silva MUST see M face to face and tell her how he feels before killing her. At the start he wants her to feel guilty by showing her how much death is caused due to her questionable decisions (the audience is left to decide if she was right or wrong). At the end Silva wants M to kill them both with the same shot, because that is his twisted idea of forcing her to admit her own faults and thus admitting that he was right about her. It would basically insinuate that M is just as bad of a person as Silva. Then Bond intervenes but at this point in the film the audience knew she had to go. She had blood on her hands (in more ways than one) and her mission about finishing the job without others' loss of life was done. So she was no longer an 'innocent' person and also had no further purpose really.
Etkö löydä elokuvaa tai TV-ohjelmaa? Kirjaudu sisään lisätäksesi se.
Vastaus käyttäjältä bratface
18 kesäkuu 2017 klo 2:18AM
It's a good movie (the only part I didn't like were the scenes at the airport), watch it on BluRay though and don't ever watch it if it comes on a regular TV station (too many cuts/edits).
Vastaus käyttäjältä Sociolect
18 kesäkuu 2017 klo 11:57AM
Spoilers **Spoilers **
Take a moment to look away if you need to. This film is great but alas, the ending is unforgivable; in part that it sets the sombre and depressing tone for the dreadful films which followed. I'd like a fan-edit to somehow miraculously repair this, consigning the later films to the bin where they belong.
The sooner 007 is handed off to more capable hands and a less miserable soul the better - the wait continues.
Vastaus käyttäjältä Maria Kelly
1 heinäkuu 2017 klo 11:51AM
@Sociolect
Why not both of them? If for no reason, to admire the time (it took them 24 days to film the Poker scenes) and effort the producers put into making up IMHO, one of the best parts of the movie.
-------Fasten your seatbelts, it's going to be a bumpy night--------
Vastaus käyttäjältä MongoLloyd
2 heinäkuu 2017 klo 1:34PM
Guess again. THIS is the best Craig Bond film yet, by far.
Vastaus käyttäjältä Maria Kelly
2 heinäkuu 2017 klo 2:36PM
@MongoLloyd
I totally, totally agree with you. The poker scenes are one of the best parts of the movie (did you know that it took 24 days to shoot that entire sequence?)!
BTW: is that Christopher Walken in your ID circle?
-------Fasten your seatbelts, it's going to be a bumpy night--------
Vastaus käyttäjältä Renovatio
2 heinäkuu 2017 klo 10:39PM
Worth it for Eva Green...
Vastaus käyttäjältä Maria Kelly
2 heinäkuu 2017 klo 11:49PM
@Moviedibert345
After I answered your post, I forgot that while the Casino Royale Poker Game was a bit dull, I remembered that it was breaks that had more action. For instance, Bond killing those Ugandan Warlords, and when La Chefiffe (sorry for the spelling) poisons Bond's and Bond nearly dies.
----------Fasten your seatbels, it's going to be a bumpy night--------
Vastaus käyttäjältä MongoLloyd
3 heinäkuu 2017 klo 8:44PM
Just from a story perspective, it outshines all the other Craig Bond films, but yeah, the poker scene, the opening chase scene, the poisoning scene, actual characters with some depth, Eva Green...
Yeah, that's Walken, hehe.
Vastaus käyttäjältä Maria Kelly
3 heinäkuu 2017 klo 10:22PM
@MongoLloyd
That's cool about Christopher Walken in your circle. Tell me, what was your opinion of him as the villian in A View To A Kill?
Although you're right about Casino Royale, I am one of those people who really liked Quantum Of Solace. IMO, I think that it wasn't well received was because it was a first for the Bond movies (a direct sequel). As you know, usually at the end of a Bond movie, he goes off into the sunset with the female lead, and that's the last the last you ever see of her. Vesper was different to Bond. He was so in love with her that her death really affected him. And I thought it was interesting that the beginning of QOS starts takes place ten minutes after the end of Casino Royale.
We both could say a lot of other things about QOS, but I've always believed that the Bond franchise embraces all different sorts of people who liked (or not) the different Bonds, etc.
I guess I'm being a little sensitive lately because a week ago I posted in one of the Bond boards that I thought Spectre was okay but it seemed like "Daniel Craig's Greatest Bond Hits" and someone posted back that because I had the nerve to say that about Spectre, it proved that I hated ALL Bond movies (WTF? )
Anyway, I have go study for my college class so have a happy Fourth of July and take care.
Vastaus käyttäjältä MongoLloyd
5 heinäkuu 2017 klo 12:13PM
I actually don't remember ever seeing AVTAK but I'm downloading it now :-)
I also really like Quantum, but I feel like CR is superior even without Olga, hehe.
What I love about the Craig Bond films is he's a bit of a rogue agent who runs off and does stuff he wants to do rather than only awaiting orders and acting on orders. In the end, he achieves the desired result, but he drives M nuts in the process.
I honestly don't remember much about Spectre at all, which means it wasn't memorable and more than likely a weak film. I vaguely remember Lea Seydoux fighting with another female character... and... Jeremy Renner?
Skyfall, I had big issues with, not the least of which was a villain capable of hacking satellites, computers, etc., who then shows up to the Skyfall estate with his henchmen to elicit an old school attack with guns. For a high tech guy with all his capabilities, you'd think he'd have waged a high tech attack. That was disappointing.
Vastaus käyttäjältä Russ007
5 heinäkuu 2017 klo 4:54PM
Lol
But he did wage a "high tech" attack at Skyfall manor. That was the whole point of the theme threaded in the film: old vs new. Silva used a helicopter armed with the lasted tech. His men carried modern rifles and had smoke grenades. That is a polar opposite to Bond's ancient house, his old shotguns, Kincade and M are tired but also "played out" and he uses his '64 Aston for crying out loud!! So it was an old school vs new school action scene.
"Sometimes the old ways are the best."
Vastaus käyttäjältä MongoLloyd
5 heinäkuu 2017 klo 5:40PM
I think it's dumb, lazy, uncreative, and pandering to the John Wick loving crowd. The showdown in The Equalizer at The Home Depot store was more compelling than the end of Skyfall.
Vastaus käyttäjältä Renovatio
5 heinäkuu 2017 klo 6:16PM
Equalizer had Denzel... No comparison...
Vastaus käyttäjältä Maria Kelly
5 heinäkuu 2017 klo 7:50PM
@Renovatio
The Equaliser movie version may have had Denzel, but the tv version had Edward Woodward and Robert Lansing.
-------Fasten your seatbelts, it's going to be a bumpy night-------
Vastaus käyttäjältä Russ007
6 heinäkuu 2017 klo 7:50AM
Um, SF came out way before JW, so drop the "pandering" act. There aren't many connections to JW either. However, the stylized fist fights could be seen as a loose similarity, I presume.
Back to the themes:
SF wasn't only an action film. It was also - wait for it - an intellectual film. People who naturally detest SF obviously didn't take note of the deep embedded themes in the movie. These central themes are integral in understanding the motives for their actions. If you don't pick up on them, then it'll ruin the enjoyment of the film.
A well known example is why Silva would let himself get caught. Stupid, you say? Not exactly. It's about betrayal and justice. Silva MUST see M face to face and tell her how he feels before killing her. At the start he wants her to feel guilty by showing her how much death is caused due to her questionable decisions (the audience is left to decide if she was right or wrong). At the end Silva wants M to kill them both with the same shot, because that is his twisted idea of forcing her to admit her own faults and thus admitting that he was right about her. It would basically insinuate that M is just as bad of a person as Silva. Then Bond intervenes but at this point in the film the audience knew she had to go. She had blood on her hands (in more ways than one) and her mission about finishing the job without others' loss of life was done. So she was no longer an 'innocent' person and also had no further purpose really.