I'm guessing the overly obvious interplay between how the wife would treat/address her husband and how she would then treat their dog, compounded with Paterson's repetitive schedule was supposed to call into question the true meaning of their relationship? It seemed pretty condescending (both the behavior and the film methodology) and like it came to nothing.
Nu găsiți un film sau un serial? Autentificați-vă pentru a-l crea.
Doriți să evaluați sau să adăugați acest element într-o listă?
Nu eşti membru?
Răspuns de nowello
pe data de 18 mai 2017 la ora 10:21AM
Spoilers His wife was very naive/childlike in her daily life in my opinion, but I liked her. She was a dreamer and wanted to find a dream she could grab on to and take off. Sometimes I felt she was taking advantage of him (Ordering the guitar they couldn't really afford), but I hoped her love for him was true. She certainly had respect for his poetry and supported it. She wanted him to chase his dreams, too. I can see why he would be smitten, though. She was very beautiful and charming.
Răspuns de Daddie0
pe data de 18 mai 2017 la ora 6:05PM
Interesting. I get that she is attractive and charming (if a bit naive), but what threw me off was that she basically treated her husband like a second dog. Very patronizing.
Răspuns de nowello
pe data de 18 mai 2017 la ora 8:17PM
True. I can see that. And he was always competing with the dog, it seemed.