When this film was released it sharply divided the critics in its depiction of the favelas. Those who loved it praised French filmmaker Marcel Camus for bringing the colors, culture & music of Rio to European & American audiences for the first time. Those who hated it attacked it for failing to depict the realism of poverty. Remember, this was 1959 when realism and the New Wave were getting a strong foothold in Europe with films like The 400 Blows and Breathless (which both lost to Black Orpheus at Cannes).
I see the haters’ point. This movie really glamorizes the favelas in its portrayal of everyone constantly smiling and every shack overlooking the sea with glorious panoramic views. It comes across like a travel brochure. But I think it works on an artistic & storytelling level, and I can’t imagine it working any other way.
I mean, if your main goal is to make a social statement, then sure you should go all the way and make a gritty drama like City of God which shows the favelas in all their stinky glory. But at the heart of this tale is a love story, an ancient Greek myth steeped in fantasy. If the filmmakers had jumbled it up with a contemporary social statement, or worse, a voyeuristic tear jerker about how ‘the other half’ lives, it would be fighting against itself.
As it is, the favelas are shown on some fantasy plane of existence that’s clearly not part of the city, not 'reality', and I think that works better than showing the ugliness of poverty & social division from the city folk. When Orpheus journeys into the city—that memorable scene at the bureau of missing persons which turns out to be an enormous bureaucratic structure that's completely empty except for a janitor sweeping up—that really drives the point home that he’s not welcome in 'clean' Rio. The hospital staff treats him with passive contempt, and the police are always shown as a menacing presence, except when by pure chance the cop recognizes him and lets him pass. And what really drives the point home is the scene at the morgue freezer: a room full of unclaimed corpses where the attendant casually tells Orpheus that it would be cheaper for the families to donate the bodies to science than to retrieve them for burial. To me that's enough to acknowledge the social hardship of poverty without shoving squalor & misery in our face.
¿No encuentras una película o serie? Inicia sesión para crearla:
¿Quieres puntuar o añadir este elemento a una lista?
¿No eres miembro?
Contestado por bratface
el 9 de junio de 2024 a las 00:44
I haven't seen this in a long time (probably the early 80s) but I did give it a 7/10. It's on Kanopy for free, so I'll give it another go in the next month or so.
Contestado por rooprect
el 9 de junio de 2024 a las 09:20
If you watch it again, check back in here and let us know what you think the 2nd time around. 7/10 is about what I felt right after it finished, but after thinking about it & watching the bonus features, I think that rating is creeping higher.
In one of the bonus features they interview the daughter of the original writer, and she says both she & her father hated it on first watch ("too artificial"), but since then they've come to regard it as a masterpiece. I think the key to enjoying this film is to think of it like a musical, no different from a mid-century MGM production with flashy colors and simplified storytelling--the opposite of realism. Kind of like West Side Story or even My Fair Lady, it depicts poverty and class divisions but without shoving the misery in our faces.
Here, in the context of Carnival, it's even more believable since Carnival is historically a celebration for the poor people, a chance to enjoy life uninhibited for a few days out of the year. And that's definitely a core theme of this film: that happiness is fleeting so enjoy it while you can.