How was that pulled off so swiftly without Casey seeing anything? Actually, I think she must have seen something because she squirms away for a second before turning on the patio light, but did Stu just run across and slit his guts open and then hide somewhere else, or did it happen another way?
Thoughts?
Non riesci a trovare un film o una serie Tv? Accedi per crearlo.
Vuoi valutare o aggiungere quest'elemento a una lista?
Non sei un membro?
Risposta da Stratego!
il 21 febbraio, 2017 alle 4:58PM
Maybe she did see a dark figure running by, the camera just doesn't show us. But it IS more difficult, ofcourse, to see what's happening outside at night when the lights are on inside. I think Stu was probably hiding on one side of the patio, ran across and slit Steve's guts and then hid on the other side.
Risposta da Lockard The GOAT
il 28 febbraio, 2017 alle 12:06AM
Movie logic. Same as getting us to believe that one person was responsible for the entire thing until it was revealed there were two killers at the end.
Risposta da littledevil
il 16 agosto, 2017 alle 8:39PM
three if you see 3.
Risposta da Stratego!
il 16 agosto, 2017 alle 9:57PM
If you're talking about Roman. He was not involved in any of the murders in the first movie. As he said himself, Billy and Stu decided to make a movie of their own.
Risposta da Cujoseph
il 27 dicembre, 2017 alle 2:50PM
Roman specifically states that he was the one who killed the principal.
Risposta da Stratego!
il 27 dicembre, 2017 alle 3:30PM
Quote please.
Risposta da Cujoseph
il 27 dicembre, 2017 alle 4:08PM
It's been awhile but I believe it went something like " I Roman killed the school principal in Scream 1. Do ya'll dig?"
Risposta da littledevil
il 27 dicembre, 2017 alle 10:38PM
I dig it.
Risposta da Stratego!
il 27 dicembre, 2017 alle 11:20PM
Must be from the non-crappy Scream 3 version that only exists in your and Guy's heads...
Risposta da Cujoseph
il 27 dicembre, 2017 alle 11:44PM
Wehoaks knows it to be true.