Maybe she did see a dark figure running by, the camera just doesn't show us. But it IS more difficult, ofcourse, to see what's happening outside at night when the lights are on inside. I think Stu was probably hiding on one side of the patio, ran across and slit Steve's guts and then hid on the other side.

Movie logic. Same as getting us to believe that one person was responsible for the entire thing until it was revealed there were two killers at the end.

@Lockard The GOAT said:

Movie logic. Same as getting us to believe that one person was responsible for the entire thing until it was revealed there were two killers at the end.

three if you see 3.

@littledevil said:

@Lockard The GOAT said:

Movie logic. Same as getting us to believe that one person was responsible for the entire thing until it was revealed there were two killers at the end.

three if you see 3.

If you're talking about Roman. He was not involved in any of the murders in the first movie. As he said himself, Billy and Stu decided to make a movie of their own.

@Stratego! said:

@littledevil said:

@Lockard The GOAT said:

Movie logic. Same as getting us to believe that one person was responsible for the entire thing until it was revealed there were two killers at the end.

three if you see 3.

If you're talking about Roman. He was not involved in any of the murders in the first movie. As he said himself, Billy and Stu decided to make a movie of their own.

Roman specifically states that he was the one who killed the principal.

@Cujoseph said:

@Stratego! said:

@littledevil said:

@Lockard The GOAT said:

Movie logic. Same as getting us to believe that one person was responsible for the entire thing until it was revealed there were two killers at the end.

three if you see 3.

If you're talking about Roman. He was not involved in any of the murders in the first movie. As he said himself, Billy and Stu decided to make a movie of their own.

Roman specifically states that he was the one who killed the principal.

Quote please.

@Stratego! said:

@Cujoseph said:

@Stratego! said:

@littledevil said:

@Lockard The GOAT said:

Movie logic. Same as getting us to believe that one person was responsible for the entire thing until it was revealed there were two killers at the end.

three if you see 3.

If you're talking about Roman. He was not involved in any of the murders in the first movie. As he said himself, Billy and Stu decided to make a movie of their own.

Roman specifically states that he was the one who killed the principal.

Quote please.

It's been awhile but I believe it went something like " I Roman killed the school principal in Scream 1. Do ya'll dig?"

@Cujoseph said:

@Stratego! said:

@Cujoseph said:

@Stratego! said:

@littledevil said:

@Lockard The GOAT said:

Movie logic. Same as getting us to believe that one person was responsible for the entire thing until it was revealed there were two killers at the end.

three if you see 3.

If you're talking about Roman. He was not involved in any of the murders in the first movie. As he said himself, Billy and Stu decided to make a movie of their own.

Roman specifically states that he was the one who killed the principal.

Quote please.

It's been awhile but I believe it went something like " I Roman killed the school principal in Scream 1. Do ya'll dig?"

I dig it.

@Cujoseph said:

@Stratego! said:

@Cujoseph said:

@Stratego! said:

@littledevil said:

@Lockard The GOAT said:

Movie logic. Same as getting us to believe that one person was responsible for the entire thing until it was revealed there were two killers at the end.

three if you see 3.

If you're talking about Roman. He was not involved in any of the murders in the first movie. As he said himself, Billy and Stu decided to make a movie of their own.

Roman specifically states that he was the one who killed the principal.

Quote please.

It's been awhile but I believe it went something like " I Roman killed the school principal in Scream 1. Do ya'll dig?"

Must be from the non-crappy Scream 3 version that only exists in your and Guy's heads...

@Stratego! said:

@Cujoseph said:

@Stratego! said:

@Cujoseph said:

@Stratego! said:

@littledevil said:

@Lockard The GOAT said:

Movie logic. Same as getting us to believe that one person was responsible for the entire thing until it was revealed there were two killers at the end.

three if you see 3.

If you're talking about Roman. He was not involved in any of the murders in the first movie. As he said himself, Billy and Stu decided to make a movie of their own.

Roman specifically states that he was the one who killed the principal.

Quote please.

It's been awhile but I believe it went something like " I Roman killed the school principal in Scream 1. Do ya'll dig?"

Must be from the non-crappy Scream 3 version that only exists in your and Guy's heads...

Wehoaks knows it to be true.