讨论 Glass

Let's say there were no cameras around.

That mysterious organization wouldn't have had serious problem to get away with the deaths of Elijah and Kevin: they could claim that Elijah was fatally injured and no medical treatment could save him, while Kevin was a total psycho and was endagering the people in the area so they had no choice but to shoot him. But what about David? How could they get away with drowning him?

4 回复(第 1 页,共 1 页)

Jump to last post

They can't hence why the Doctor was screaming at the end. She's up shit's creek and she knows it.

However, let's take your scenario, with no cameras around they could explain David's death as either happened during his fight with Kevin. Or an accident the occurred while he was resisting arrest. That's how police get away with stuff these day, isn't it? Heck, IRL that excuse even works when the whole thing is filmed and shown untrue.

Hmm... if David was beaten to death, yes, they could have got away with that - claiming that either Kevin did that, or that David was resisting arrest and they had no choice but to use "reasonable" force, like you said. But by drowning?! That's not so plausible.

@Strawberry Shortcake said:

Hmm... if David was beaten to death, yes, they could have got away with that - claiming that either Kevin did that, or that David was resisting arrest and they had no choice but to use "reasonable" force, like you said. But by drowning?! That's not so plausible.

Without the footage, they could say that David was knocked unconscious face down onto a puddle by Kevin which resulted in him drowning.

This is what happens when a movie maker produces a film that is essentially some kind of thriller, and then in a sequel pivots it to a more or less straight superhero film.

No one asks why Superman or Batman get away with so much killing. Sure it does pop up from time to time, like when Batman goes apeshit about Superman's reckless killing, or The Daily Bugle has a campaign against The Spiderman. But in the genre these are mere obstacles to the protagonist. The question is really about how these heroes sometimes battle with public support. It isn't anything forensic about the legalities of these multitudinous deaths.

The OP is really applying the sensibilities of a different genre: whatever Unbreakable was, it wasn't a superhero movie. That's not the fault of any of the posters on this thread. It is a problem that relates to a sequel that is completely different in character to the original.

But to reply to the OP in good faith, the answer is that no hospital in this universe could get away with 5 murders in one day without pretty much everyone concerned losing their jobs or going to prison.

找不到电影或剧集?登录并创建它吧。

全站通用

s 聚焦到搜索栏
p 打开个人资料菜单
esc 关闭打开的窗口
? 打开键盘快捷键窗口

在媒体页面

b 返回(或返回上级)
e 进入编辑页面

在电视季页面

(右箭头)下一季
(左箭头)前一季

在电视集页面

(右箭头)下一集
(左箭头)前一集

在所有图像页面

a 打开添加图片窗口

在所有编辑页面

t 打开翻译选择器
ctrl+ s 提交

在讨论页面

n 创建新讨论
w 切换关注状态
p 设为公开 / 私密讨论
c 关闭 / 开放讨论
a 打开活动页
r 回复讨论
l 跳转至最新回复
ctrl+ enter 发送信息
(右箭头)下一页
(左箭头)前一页

设置

想给这个条目评分或将其添加到片单中?

登录

还不是会员?

注册加入社区