mechajutaro, I did not ask was it a good idea of the scriptwriters to include those characters in the film, in order to make it more fascinating to the viewers.

My question is whether it was, from Peter/Tom Holland's POV, a good idea to attempt changing past events, without taking into consideration the possible applications.

@Strawberry Shortcake said:

mechajutaro, I did not ask was it a good idea of the scriptwriters to include those characters in the film, in order to make it more fascinating to the viewers.

My question is whether it was, from Peter/Tom Holland's POV, a good idea to attempt changing past events, without taking into consideration the possible applications.

He likes to make up his own threads in other people's threads, it's not personal.

@mechajutaro said:

@Adammm said:

@Strawberry Shortcake said:

mechajutaro, I did not ask was it a good idea of the scriptwriters to include those characters in the film, in order to make it more fascinating to the viewers.

My question is whether it was, from Peter/Tom Holland's POV, a good idea to attempt changing past events, without taking into consideration the possible applications.

He likes to make up his own threads in other people's threads, it's not personal.

Not quite. Do we really believe that this movie would have drawn the crowds that it did, had it not been for the gimmick of having all the Spidermans aside from Nick Hammond together again on screen, plus Wilem Dafoe and Dr Octopus? I say this as a viewer who actually enjoyed NWH

But it's not the topic of this thread.

I found it surprising yet interesting that Marvel stepped into such contention political territory by producing such a clear allegory for legally enforced covid vaccinations.

Yes, Spider-Man wanted to cure these evil characters and prevent bad things happening to them via physiological alterations but should they be free to make that choice themselves rather than having it enforced upon them by the morally righteous?

Very interesting stuff... But as to any timeline changes, that's not the way the MCU works with it's multiverse. i.e. Norman Osborne going back "cured" would create an alternate branched universe. Harry's story would continue to exist on the original branch.

@Midi-chlorian_Count said:

I found it surprising yet interesting that Marvel stepped into such contention political territory by producing such a clear allegory for legally enforced covid vaccinations.

Yes, Spider-Man wanted to cure these evil characters and prevent bad things happening to them via physiological alterations but should they be free to make that choice themselves rather than having it enforced upon them by the morally righteous?

Very interesting stuff... But as to any timeline changes, that's not the way the MCU works with it's multiverse. i.e. Norman Osborne going back "cured" would create an alternate branched universe. Harry's story would continue to exist on the original branch.

So Norman would still be Green Goblin and dead in the original branch?