The first time I saw Pulp Fiction I laughed when Marvin accidentally gets shot in the face. Then I had the reaction of "Was I suppose to laugh? Was that the director's intent?" It's the element of surpise. With horror movies sometimes the reaction of horror is followed by laughter, like a fun roller coaster. Did you laugh the first time? I feel weird having that kind of reaction to violence.
فیلم و نمایش تلویزیونی را نمیتوانید پیدا کنید؟ به سیستم وارد شوید تا آن را ایجاد کنید.
آیا میخواهید به این مورد امتیاز دهید یا به فهرست اضافه کنید؟
عضو نیستید؟
پاسخ توسط Russ007
در تاریخ فوریه 12, 2017 ساعت 6:29 ق.ض
Yeah I think the audience is meant to laugh because it's completely unexpected when you first watch it.
Why is it weird to laugh at violence on screen ? Many films use violence as a comedic tool. Just look at the silent slapstick films in the 20s like Buster Keaton and Chaplin/ Laurel and Hardy. Even back then it was normal.
پاسخ توسط diamonddaisy
در تاریخ فوریه 12, 2017 ساعت 5:36 ب.ض
I just don't want to feel that I'm desensitized to violence, even in a movie. Now that I've thought about it more I'm sure I've laughed at violence, but I never second guessed myself like I did with Pulp Fiction.
پاسخ توسط stargazer
در تاریخ فوریه 12, 2017 ساعت 6:14 ب.ض
There are moments in old time radio where it would be considered politically incorrect these day. I was just listening to Father Knows Best where his little girl was annoying him to the point that he started to mimic her. I chuckled.
پاسخ توسط DRDMovieMusings
در تاریخ فوریه 12, 2017 ساعت 6:55 ب.ض
Actually, Marvin getting killed speaks to several key themes that I believe Tarantino is weaving into this movie. I discuss the details of Marvin's death here, the 5th installment of my Pulp Fiction series. While reading one may seem far-fetched, if you get through them all you might see the collage in entirety.
پاسخ توسط microscope
در تاریخ فوریه 12, 2017 ساعت 8:56 ب.ض
I thought it was horrible and didn't laugh. But my friends thought it was hilarious and they all laughed about it after the movie.
پاسخ توسط Stratego!
در تاریخ فوریه 14, 2017 ساعت 7:08 ب.ض
There's definitely the element of shock and surprise, and it's possible you react to that with laughter (I didn't, though). But I don't think Tarantino intended for you to find the kid getting shot in the face to be funny. Their reaction , of Vincent especially, is certainly meant to be funny.
پاسخ توسط microscope
در تاریخ فوریه 14, 2017 ساعت 7:50 ب.ض
^ Yeah. The whole film is like that really. It is funny sometimes but it is very dark.
پاسخ توسط SlickySlixta
در تاریخ فوریه 21, 2017 ساعت 6:22 ب.ض
The scenario as a whole is supposed to be darkly humorous. I laughed when it happened because I wasn't expecting it and Jules and Vincent's reactions added to the humour.
پاسخ توسط Papshmir
در تاریخ فوریه 22, 2017 ساعت 5:17 ق.ض
Not sure if I was meant to but I did laugh. It was hilarious.
پاسخ توسط MichaelMyers
در تاریخ مه 2, 2017 ساعت 9:09 ب.ض
Yeah it's damn funny. Why wouldn't it be funny? On behalf of political correctness? IT'S A BLEEP...G! MOVIE! That's why we buy popcorn ,and soda before going in. It's our make believe world. If we can't separate the two, I'm more worried about us. FUNNY AS HELL
پاسخ توسط BarkingBaphomet
در تاریخ مه 2, 2017 ساعت 9:42 ب.ض
i find Vincent's reaction the funny bit.
i just shot Marvin in the face...
the delivery and his expression, as if he'd stepped in dog do.
پاسخ توسط MichaelMyers
در تاریخ مه 2, 2017 ساعت 9:51 ب.ض
It's just good stuff.
پاسخ توسط tmdb53400018
در تاریخ مه 2, 2017 ساعت 10:48 ب.ض
Yeah, it is. Tarantino's original script initially called for Marvin to get shot in the throat, not the face...a really ugly, agonizing scenario as Marvin does not die at once. The black kid who played Marvin told Tarantino that this scenario would cause people to dislike Jules and Vincent, so QT changed it to what you see in the film.
I actually believe QT is so sick that the final reveal of Marvin in the car's trunk before Winston tosses the garbage bag over his bloody body is supposed to be funny, too.
پاسخ توسط Renovatio
در تاریخ مه 3, 2017 ساعت 12:35 ب.ض
It's the shock and disbelief that it happened and that the director did it that makes you laugh... it's not immoral... your laughing because you know that it's not real and that the actor didn't die... and That that isn't blood... it's just red....
Yet. At the same time it is a visceral experience... that's why it's such a good scene... something Tarantino has been mostly unable to replicate since...
پاسخ توسط DRDMovieMusings
در تاریخ مه 3, 2017 ساعت 1:46 ب.ض
I dunno, I can think of several remarkably layered scenes in From Dusk till Dawn, Kill Bill franchise, Django Unchained...all since Pulp Fiction (although PF is my favourite).