What the hell was his end game? That made no sense. He went from the most cunning guy on the show with a lust for power, to a guy that wanted to die slowly in his Roman Bath. Lame.
찾으시는 영화나 TV 프로그램이 없나요? 로그인 하셔서 직접 만들어주세요.
Want to rate or add this item to a list?
Not a member?
TheShredder님의 댓글
6월 5, 2017 at 2:17 오후
I never understood that character. Was he evil, was he kind? Was he manipulating people, was he just trying to understand people? I never understood his motivation, nor agenda. But I liked the character. I imagine that the real Eckbert was more of a tyrant, considering the time and era, and what I know from history. This Eckbert seemed very progressive, almost 21st Century.
Urban Commando님의 댓글
6월 7, 2017 at 4:41 오전
Total agree. I liked the character too. That's why I'm disappointed in his demise.
SevenHouses님의 댓글
6월 7, 2017 at 1:51 오후
I kind of fell asleep during the last episodes so I will forever remember the chemistry between Ragnar (sigh) and Ecbert.
Urban Commando님의 댓글
6월 8, 2017 at 1:53 오전
The two chilling in the Roman Bath saying they are good men but corrupt men was one of the best scenes in the whole series.
SevenHouses님의 댓글
6월 8, 2017 at 2:54 오전
I totally agree!
SevenHouses님의 댓글
6월 8, 2017 at 7:41 오전
I think you're right. (I would have to watch some seasons again..) But Ecbert and Ragnar did bathe together. I think I liked that scene too, hehe.
SevenHouses님의 댓글
6월 8, 2017 at 8:10 오전
Can't get enough of them:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DtH0mE5fzU
I always did like the ambiguity in Vikings. Many things were up for more than one interpretation.
Urban Commando님의 댓글
6월 9, 2017 at 2:29 오전
I guess I got those two scenes mixed up.
His Excellency님의 댓글
12월 8, 2017 at 2:41 오후
xxpo?
His Excellency님의 댓글
12월 8, 2017 at 4:44 오후
[Clap]